Can't really agree with this myself. WPM's record in the Supreme is phenomenal. He will still probably account for 3 of the first 7 in the betting and if he suggests one appears to be infinitely better than the others at home, I think it would be daft not to listen. He's earnt the right to be the first port of call in this race for me.
He's not known for his hyperbole, and when he speaks about one like this, it's generally because they are a bit special.
I think it'd also a bit harsh that Melon is being crabbed in some quarters. It's not his fault he's only had one run, nor that the race looked weak. He could no more than he did and is firmly in the 'could be anything' bracket.
I completely agree. You can't argue WPM's record in the race, and for once at Cheltenham we know his horses for this race over other trainers, just look at the potential re-routed horses from the betting:
Moon Race - possible CH runner
Ballyandy - Potential Neptune runner and STD said on some podcast that currently leaning towards the Neptune but no decision has been made.
Charli Parcs - We don't know if he will run yet, but if he does the Triumph is more a possibility now given his run at the weekend.
Neon Wolf & Finian's Oscar - Recent money would suggest they are Neptune bound.
Defi Du Seuil - Looks Triumph Bound.
Consul Du Thaix - Coral Cup seems a likely target.
Airlie Beach - Novice Mares race.
If you look at the above you can see why the bookmakers would want to take precaution against the WPM runners, it's all 'if's and buts' but potentially the race could fall apart, and Melon definitely wouldn't have to be anything special to win it, the fact they seem to think he could be special only solidifies his claims at the head of the market now, given the record of the trainer and his confidence from yesterdays stable tour.
WPM would have 3 of the top 5 in the betting should the above get re-routed.