punterorplonker
Member
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2017
- Messages
- 760
- Reaction score
- 96
- Points
- 28
I was also very confused why after the race Skelton came out about going to aintree it makes no sense.
They reckon it's 5.2 on the going stick and they've had no rain today, as of 5pm. I work 15 mins away and that's bollocks, it's pissed it down all dayHaydock latest going report (but only as at Friday):
Going/Track:
GOOD TO SOFT, SOFT (IN PLACES)
(GoingStick:4.3 on 06-02-2026 at 16:00)
(Soil moisture average: 60% on 06-02-2026 at 16:00)
Between 10 and 20mm rain expected from today after 26mm since that going report.
Been pissing down all night and still is as of 7am so that will have changedThey reckon it's 5.2 on the going stick and they've had no rain today, as of 5pm. I work 15 mins away and that's bollocks, it's pissed it down all day
It pissed down all day yesterday in Wigan so Haydock will have had exactly the same. Heavy rain expected today with a drier Friday and sunny Saturday.
Id say heavy
Going ended up being good to soft but withdrew when they thought it was heavy. I'm guessing he would have raced him if they knew the ground wasn't heavy like first reported.Anyone work out what Skelton was playing at? It was always going to be testing so what was the point of entry? If he now doesn't run at Cheltenham - which I fully expect - then it looks absolutely pointless. Lucky him to be able throw away leading chances - how many others has he got in Grade 1 that will be in the first few in the betting?
Maybe the lazy fat cnut should've walked the course, its what good trainers & jockeys do.Going ended up being good to soft but withdrew when they thought it was heavy. I'm guessing he would have raced him if they knew the ground wasn't heavy like first reported.
If you really wanted to run then that's what you would have done, or at least got someone to do it.Maybe the lazy fat cnut should've walked the course, its what good trainers & jockeys do.
I understand your frustration. I think there is a dynamic creeping in with both Dan and with Gordon. Gordon has seen any prize money advantage he has held early and mid season be eroded year after year after year. Similarly Dan is desperate to win the title over here and last year would have really hurt. Both trainers will be thinking exactly what do I have to do to beat this guy.Just reading the quotes from Skelton on the Racing Post site. Does anyone talk more rot? Apparently, there is now more chance of Kabral Du Mathan running at Cheltenham, and he would definitely run if he was 7. What's the point of even saying that? Just checked and since 1972 17 7yo's and 16 6yo's have won the Stayers. That hardly shouts inconvenience, and if you add in the fact he is french bred and they are that much more precocious it becomes even more of a ridiculous excuse. In fact he might be actually losing an advantage by waiting a year, particularly as we know it is a weak division this year. He also quotes Teahupoo and Bob Olinger as if they are strong stayers. I can buy Teahupoo, but Bob Olinger is speed over stamina. He got the sort of ride last year that you might expect Kabral Du Mathan to get.
What exactly is he waiting for, surely he could commit to running now, if that is the actual intention? To my mind he is just continuing to play silly buggers with backers.
As a non backer, I hope you’re wrongI think Kabral Du Mathan has a right chance in this anyway. The Skeltons were looking at this race the wrong way for me. If they amble around like they did last year, Kabral could easily be the fastest horse in a finish. It's well worth chancing their arm.
He wouldn't be out of place in the champion hurdle so if they do go no pace he'd be very tough to beat.I think Kabral Du Mathan has a right chance in this anyway. The Skeltons were looking at this race the wrong way for me. If they amble around like they did last year, Kabral could easily be the fastest horse in a finish. It's well worth chancing their arm.