With no malice intended to people who think different - when it comes to connells comments, I really think people need to grow a pair.
Its a bit of harmless thrash talk that adds to the entertainment of it all. He's not saying anything terrible, basically just that he thinks his horse is far better than the others. Its not as if he's insulting Henderson or laughing at il etait temps falling or something. Every single other sport has this and people laugh and say its good for the game, but in racing its not allowed apparently.
There's never any controversy about him - no betting irregularities, not known for cheating and fielding non triers, went out of his way to keep everyone up to date on William munnys injury. You can literally send him an email asking about future plans for his horses, and he'll respond with a fully honest answer, as he has several times to people on here. But he's the guy you have a problem with in racing?
Not the countless other big name trainers/owners who are considered "classier", who are fielding non triers every week and cheating to make a bit of cash or get a nice handicap mark. Who go out of their way to keep injuries secret for as long as possible, but we know anyway because of exchange movement days or weeks earlier. Who tell barefaced lies to the public about how well they're horse is, despite the exchange and people with links to the yard stating the opposite which turns out to be true.
But nevermind all that, the moral line is drawn at him being too honest and saying that he thinks his horse is better than somebody else's?