Saxon Warrior
Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2019
- Messages
- 10,592
- Reaction score
- 6,964
- Points
- 83
Is his middle name Hitler? :highly_amused::highly_amused::highly_amused:
(Think of the war time song)
:congratulatory::congratulatory::congratulatory:
Is his middle name Hitler? :highly_amused::highly_amused::highly_amused:
(Think of the war time song)
No shit there Sherlock.
Why everyone digging him out then? If he hasn't got the horses he wont run them there. Up yours!
Perhaps we want to see the best horses take each other on. There is a thing called place money.
And its why is not Why everyone.
Why everyone digging him out then? If he hasn't got the horses he wont run them there. Up yours!
He hasn't had the best horses. If he thinks they have a win chance they'll run. He knows their ability better than people on this forum that have had their ?10 on.
He hasn't had the best horses. If he thinks they have a win chance they'll run. He knows their ability better than people on this forum that have had their ?10 on.
He hasn't had the best horses. If he thinks they have a win chance they'll run. He knows their ability better than people on this forum that have had their ?10 on.
Nicholls avoiding cheltenham with his best horses is why I think Dan Skelton will become top trainer in the next few season I reckon
He thought frodon could win a gold cup.
and cyrname before that.
and clan des obeaux before that.
I didn’t have ?10 on any of them cos they had no chance. And he should’ve known better .
I think he talks bollocks more than he needs to.
less is more, like uncle Willie
They forced his hand by winning the King George. His best usually do run there that's the point. Cyrname hasn't run at Cheltenham. I know you have ?10 a point though. Probably more than Spectre with his 20 points at ?2 a point :topsy_turvy:
Nicholls avoiding cheltenham with his best horses is why I think Dan Skelton will become top trainer in the next few season I reckon
I don’t disagree but I thought Skelton was poor at Cheltenham last March.
He believed Allmankind could beat Shishkin, had Not That Fuisse executing a two year plan in the G Annual and could only manage 5th, had Third Time Lucki plotted for the County and he found about half a dozen better on the day, threw Roksana in the Mares having shown improved form all year for the step up to 3m.
He is an outstanding trainer who will win plenty of UK titles and no doubt a few big festival races but I think he’d like to have a few of those decisions back…
I agree with every word of this regarding Dan Skelton. I think Harry Skelton would also like to take back the way he rode Allmankind in the Arkle. He set a daft pace and paid the price. I think he’d also want to redo the ride on Not That Fuisse too. He left him with too much to do too late. That said, I think Dan Skelton will be Champion trainer before long and is one to have on side when he gets the right ammo.
Let’s be clear, Paul Nichols is a phenomenal trainer but I think he’s also a realist. He also values chasing above hurdling, which I think answers the question regarding Monmiral. ie he’d much rather mind him and have a successful chasing career with him than bottom him out but win a Triumph in the process.
He entered Bravemansgame, whom he valued highly. He entered Next Destination whom he valued highly. Yes, he might let his enthusiasm get the better of him when horses like Frodon win a King George or whatever but you roll the dice and you take your chance. Who would have thought Politologue would have won the Champion Chase when Altior and Chacun when entered (albeit they didn’t run) or Dodging Bullets. He knows what he’s doing he just needs the firepower.
Bottom out and triumph hurdle don’t deserve to be in the same sentence.
And anyone who thinks differently doesn’t know what they’re doing or saying.
That depends upon the nature of the race, surely? A hard run race at the end of a season for a young horse could absolutely impact the horse going forward. Henderson doesn’t like the Bumper, probably for good reason, may be a similar reason. Personally, I am happy to concede that Nichols, Henderson and Skelton know way more than me on horse racing and a hell of a lot more than me on what is and isn’t right for their horses. Anyone who thinks they know more than these trainers doesn’t know what they’re doing or saying.
I would love to see Nichols and Skelton run all heir best horses at the festival but may be, just may be, there are reasons for not doing so.
I don’t disagree but I thought Skelton was poor at Cheltenham last March.
He believed Allmankind could beat Shishkin, had Not That Fuisse executing a two year plan in the G Annual and could only manage 5th, had Third Time Lucki plotted for the County and he found about half a dozen better on the day, threw Roksana in the Mares having shown improved form all year for the step up to 3m.
He is an outstanding trainer who will win plenty of UK titles and no doubt a few big festival races but I think he’d like to have a few of those decisions back…