I like different approaches as well. For me, I wouldn't bet based on stats, nor would I change a strong opinion for stats, but I do like that in a game where opinions and interpretation of ability varies dramatically, that we have as many stats as we do. I enjoy reading them and will let them factor into my decision making where appropriate. The pro stat people say 'stats exist for a reason'. The stats are pointless people will say 'stats were made to be broken'. I see both as valid views.
I don't read them at all.
But I respect hose that use them and if I could see the ones that the stats say. Maybe 4 or so a race. The results would interest me.
Because I just don't see how 1 hirse regardless of age sex weight replicates other horses form different years. As that horse is a completely different horse in all aspects of ability which to me deems the stats completely pointless.
Very interested and happy to be proven wrong.
Last edited: