Would you have a selection process in order of preference for what you look for? Eye test over breeding, or p2p form over both, for example?
I know you use the eye test more than me, I've tried including it more into my selection process but would still have breeding ahead in terms of priority for me, for all that you'll get plenty of outliers on the breeding front, too.
Tough to put those elements in order of preference as I'm usually looking at them all to form an opinion. In some cases there will be elements missing so I'll have to choose whether to ignore them or not. Some horses made it on my P2P list based on performance over pedigree but some I marked up a slightly lower performance as they had a decent pedigree.
1. Eye test.
I don't blindly go for wide margin winners, in fact I think those races are often overrated. I usually prefer horses that are in behind and have the class to win by showing some speed at the finish. Times and ground conditions are factored in to this assessment. It can be too easy to chase the fast times, but if the horse I like was held up, he's at the mercy of the horse leading so it's less relevant.
2. Pedigree.
Adds some substance to the eye test and the likelihood that the performance will be backed up in the future. I have some sires I would usually steer clear of and some that I'm a big fan of, but it's not always black and white. Some on my lists have lovely pedigrees and some aren't anything to write home about.
3. Depth of race.
This is based on the horses that run as opposed to subsequent form. For instance, if I see lot's of the big handlers and owners with runners in the same race then there is better chance that the winner will prove decent. There are also some tracks and races that I focus on, not too dissimilar to race trends under rules. My lists are compiled before there is any real form to consider anyway and often P2P form can prove meaningless anyway. Funnily enough, Korkoran is a good example of this. The form of his P2P is absolutely gash but at the time he made my list, there was nothing to go on.
4. Media snippets / Social Media / DMs etc
If I see a performance I like then I start to go digging for more information. Most handlers will talk up a horse as they're in the sales business, but sometimes there is the odd comment that can help to put real meat on the bone.