Strange old day. Betting wise, it is what it is for me. I go full book and tend to make most an equal (or close enough) winner. Golden Ace was a better winner than Constitution Hill for me. But I must admit that after the feeling of confusion and discombobulation subsided I felt quite deflated. We were robbed of a great clash. The mare didn't turn up, but even then, State Man was on for his best ever Cheltenham performance (and perhaps his best ever full stop). Constitution Hill couldn't have been far beneath his best to have beaten him today in my opinion. Absolutely fair play to connections of Golden Ace, they deserve it, but it did seem like a day that was missing a top race, and that's not likely to be delivered by the Championship races on Weds or Thurs either.
The RPR's make for interesting reading. A potential superstar in a great race in the Supreme. Awarded an RPR of 160 which rates a good rather than extraordinary winner which is fair enough I think given how close Romeo and William Munny were. However, I think the three of them could be very good and the form of the race will work out well (much better than last years, anyway).
The Arkle was won by a stayer who in the jockeys words "will never run over 2 miles again" with the potential new shiny thing back in third after jumping everything either a 1/10 or a 10/10. Much better to be an average and consistent jumper when you've an engine like that. The winner was awarded an RPR of 161 which is the lowest (weight adjusted) in the last 10 years.
The Mares is won with a higher RPR than the Champion Hurdle. And I think it underestimates how much Lossie had in hand and also how well those in behind her ran. I'd have that 160+. Jetara ran her race and is a 145 horse.
The Champion Hurdle is won with a rating of 154, which is potentially generous. The 2nd, 3rd, and 4th were all hampered by State Man falling, so I couldn't have Burdett Road running a career best.