hopefully he is as good as the he everyone thinks. Very impressive so farTill the bubble bursts its Samcro all the way , something else this fella.
Samcro entered up on Sunday in the same race labaik won last season , 1st time iv considered posting about samcro on the supreme thread.
Still think if the cap fits beats him though.
If the cap fits jocked up over 2m on sat
So you think 33/1 If The Cap Fits is a good play for this race I assumme?
I keep getting tempted to back him as a 'saver' but remember I don't need to as I backed him for any race :highly_amused:
Would send a few multiples down for me though!
Till the bubble bursts its Samcro all the way , something else this fella.
The stable looked like they punted him for this race and i wonder how much influence that will have on the decision if it looks like being a tight call, which it surely will be, assuming he gets there fit.
Them 5/1's are slowly disappearing about Samcro. Based on price alone it looks as though he is nailed on to come here, but we know that doesn't always end up the case!
We recently saw with the David Evans / Ladbrokes case that bookmakers are willing to shorten a horse when given some information about it, whilst connections manage to continuously get on the horse in a different race, all the while the public are unaware.
Now I'm not saying this is like that case, as the exchanges fully point to this race as its target also, but in no way would I be surprised if it ends up in the Supreme, being the cynic that I am!
would it be right in thinking maybe Elliott is a little more cautious of the public and antepost punters than mullins is? running death duty in the albert bartlett when he was clearly not right all week (apparently) makes me think this.
To be perfectly honest I'm not convinced many trainers care too much about the every day punter, they have no obligation too either so for that reason I have no complaints in how they go about their business, that said I am also very sceptical about every single one of them, although never find myself shying away from a bet due to a particular trainer.
When things like the Evans / Ladbrokes case come to light I see no reason why my views on trainers should change either.
I am 100% convinced there are some very honest and reliable trainers out there, but I'm not great at reading them amongst the, shall we say, less honest ones.
"No lose betting accounts panorama" springs to mind. Might be worth a Google.
I must admit I like this though as if you know the certain trainers and bookmakers, the target becomes very obvious. Especially with chelt antepost.
Saw this Scooby.
The only thing with certain trainers and bookmakers is they could easily blind side you into believing one runner was targeted at a race that isn't etc.... And with ante post punting that's your money down the drain already if this happens.