Clowns on Upping the Ante suggesting there is some talk that Mighty Park could be held back for next year
Anyone heard anything from connections ?
You mention it's not a small sample.I am sure not running would make no sense to everyone who threw a dart at a big price. For those who didn't the stats are awful for such an inexperienced horse. He is trying to do what no other horse has done in more than 50 years. That's not a small sample. He looks much more a chaser than hurdler, and looking at his long term future perhaps throwing him into a race like the Turners on just his second start, wouldn't be the best idea? If they skip Cheltenham, he could have options at Fairyhouse, Aintree, and Punchestown.
This could be an expensive cash out if we get it wrong!You mention it's not a small sample.
But in the last 50 years how many have tried to win after winning just the one race they ran in prior.
I bet not many have even tried.
He had a hurdle run in france, and also had run on the flatI suppose a recent example of similar would be el fabiolo
Who won his maiden in january and went to aintree not cheltenham
False fav though!!Are we in the silly season stage where we're debating if a G1 novice hurdle favourite isn't going to run at the festival, so they can hold him back to be ineligible for novice hurdles next year?
He got a cut at the DRF too and was a NR which made them reappraise his festival participation. The intention was at the time to run him in the Supreme.He had a hurdle run in france, and also had run on the flat
I look forward to you going through 50+ fields and confirming. Only about a 1000 horses. Good luck.You mention it's not a small sample.
But in the last 50 years how many have tried to win after winning just the one race they ran in prior.
I bet not many have even tried.
So he was more experienced and still skipped itHe had a hurdle run in france, and also had run on the flat
I am sure not running would make no sense to everyone who threw a dart at a big price. For those who didn't the stats are awful for such an inexperienced horse. He is trying to do what no other horse has done in more than 50 years. That's not a small sample. He looks much more a chaser than hurdler, and looking at his long term future perhaps throwing him into a race like the Turners on just his second start, wouldn't be the best idea? If they skip Cheltenham, he could have options at Fairyhouse, Aintree, and Punchestown.
It sounds to me as if you are trying to convince yourself. I would suggest you are the one who is actually talking nonsense, but clearly don't realise it. I actually posed a question, I didn't say he wouldn't run. It doesn't bother me a jot if he runs or not. I have just tried to add a little balance. It would be a surprise if Cheltenham wasn't the toughest task of those four Festivals.This doesn't make much sense. What evidence is there that the Turners will somehow bottom a horse on its second start is there. In a way that categorically won't happen if it's second start is at one of the other festivals.
He'll run in the Turners.
Whether you think he'll win or not can be questioned but to say he won't run out of choice is complete nonsense.