Aftertiming a price that's gone is definitely irrelevant! :biggrin-new: The 14s or the 16s was the discussion, as best available at the time.
I'm not sure I follow the end of the second paragraph but fair play, let's move on. GL with the BANC bet regardless.
It’s relevant to the fact I don’t think many would back him at 16/1, would you? So the 14/1 is only decent if you think backing at 16/1 is decent imo, yes you get the added insurance of any race but the second paragraph would be my opinion he’ll be campaigned for the BANC as that what nicholls tends to do with his Gold Cup horses.
He may obviously change his way and everything I’ve said is irrelevant :glee: