Originally posted by Kevloaf
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Fat Jockey Patrons
Fat Jockey is a horse racing community focused on all the big races in the UK and Ireland. We don't charge users but if you have found the site useful then any support towards the running costs is appreciated.
Become a Patron!
You can also make a one-off donation here:
Become a Patron!
You can also make a one-off donation here:
See more
See less
Albert Bartlett Novice Hurdle 2018
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Robbante View PostI think he could overcome the lack of experience. The way he races he’ll just creep into it, so won’t get involved in any battle up front. They think that much of him that they won’t ruin his career for the sake of one race, but just think he could have the class to pick them off up the hill. A lot of people seem to fancy chef des obeaux, even Henderson has said he’d be the one on soft, but I can’t be having that. Chef des obeaux is a battler who needs soft ground, Santini needs good ground, Henderson convinced of that. Yet Santini easily put Chef Des Obeaux to bed on soft ground over 20f, and then outstayed Black Op on heavy ground over the same trip. If you factor in that this is a horse that needs good ground to show his best then he really could be a superstar
I like Santina a lot but he has not tackled 3 miles yet also has not won on good to soft plus has only had two races, if it was a two horse race I would lump on Chef Des Obeaux.
I have both of them so I not talking via my pocket, just stating facts.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sirbetalot View PostThat was over 20f and most likely took the speed out of Chef Des Obeaux, then Chef Des Obeaux has come out two times over 2.7 miles then 3 miles & 1/2f and knocked them out of the park. also Henderson said he seems better on soft but also said he could be better on good ground.
I like Santina a lot but he has not tackled 3 miles yet also has not won on good to soft plus has only had two races, if it was a two horse race I would lump on Chef Des Obeaux.
I have both of them so I not talking via my pocket, just stating facts.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kevloaf View PostAt Fishers Cross - 9 career runs
Brindisi Breeze - 7 career runs
Bobs Worth - 6 career runs
Would be Santini's 4th, Cracking Smart's 8th
Bob's Worth was a top class horse with a smashing attitude (never headed once he hit the frot is one of my favourite "stats" when he won the Gold Cup!
The "theory" though is that you need a battle-hardened horse or horse with plenty of experience to win the race.... that isn't a struggle to see?
At Fishers Cross 8
Brindisi Breeze 6 (including point)
Bobs Worth 5
Hardly conclusive that experience is a major factor. What is a battle-hardened horse? I am pretty sure some horses are just tougher than others however many runs they might have had.
Personally, I don't think they would run Santini if they felt experience would prevent him winning.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robbante View PostCome and knocked who out the park? Not Santini. The only fact we have on form between the two is that Santini is better over 20f on soft ground (he outstayed chef des obeaux). In a two horse race between Santini and Chef Des Obeaux over 2m, 2m 4 and 3 miles on any ground I would back Santini every single time. A week on Friday we shall hopefully see
Comment
-
Originally posted by kinloch brae View PostFor some reason you have added one run on to each. Bit unfair to include the race itself.
At Fishers Cross 8
Brindisi Breeze 6 (including point)
Bobs Worth 5
Hardly conclusive that experience is a major factor. What is a battle-hardened horse? I am pretty sure some horses are just tougher than others however many runs they might have had.
Personally, I don't think they would run Santini if they felt experience would prevent him winning.
They may run Santini because they feel experience won't prevent him winning, and he might get beat - and I'll still feel like I want a horse with lots of racecourse experience and a tough attitude on my side.
Battle-harded for me is a combination of tough attitude and racecourse experience. I assume you know exactly what I meant.
I'll have a look now at all the runnings because I think the "theory" Paul Kealy mentioned needs some context to it, as it may well be true for only some, and not others.
Comment
-
Number of runs leading up to winning the Albert Bartlett
2017 - 16/1 - Penhill - 25 runs (18 flat, 7 hurdle)
2016 - 11/1 - Unowhatimeanharry - 17 runs (all hurdles)
2015 - 14/1- Martello Tower - 9 runs- (1 PTP, 2 bumper, 6 hurdles)
2014 - 33/1 - Very Wood - 7 runs - (2 PTP, 1 bumper, 4 hurdles)
2013 - 11/8f - At Fishers Cross - 8 runs (2 bumper, 6 hurdles)
2012 - 7/1 - Brindisi Breeze - 6 runs (2 PTP, 1 bumper, 3 hurdles)
2011 - 15/8f Bobs Worth - 5 runs (2 bumper, 3 hurdles)
2010 - 33/1 - Berties Dream - 15 runs (1 bumper, 14 hurdles)
2009 - 8/1 - Weapon's Amnesty 8/1 - 6 runs (2 bumper, 4 hurdle)
2008 - 9/1 - Nenuphar Collonges 9/1 - 11 runs (3 flat, 8 hurdles)
2007 - 11/8f - Wichita Lineman - 8 runs (4 flat, 4 hurdles)
2006 - 1/1f - Black Jack Kethum - 5 runs (2 bumper, 3 hurdle)
2005 - 9/1 - Moulin Riche - 15 runs (2 flat, 13 hurdle)
Average of 10.5 runs prior to the race for each winner.
2x horses have both won with 5 runs or less (Bobs Worth and Black Jack Kethum - both went off favourite)
All 4 winning favourites had 8 runs or less
Horses with double figures for number of runs have won at 9/1, 9/1, 33/1, 11/1, 16/1
Looking at the runners near the top of the market...
Cracking Smart - 7 runs (1 flat, 6 hurdles)
Santini - 3 runs (1 PTP, 2 hurdle)
Duc Des Genievres - 3 runs (3 hurdles)
Next Destination - 7 runs (1 PTP, 3 bumper, 3 hurdles)
Chef Des Obeaux - 7 runs (3 bumper, 4 hurdles)
Poetic Rhythm - 16 runs (6 PTP, 3 flat, 7 hurdles)
Red River - 4 runs (1 PTP, 3 hurdles)
Mr Whipped - 5 runs (1 PTP, 4 hurdles)
Ballyward - 4 runs (1 PTP, 1 bumper, 2 hurdles)
Calett Mad - 15 runs (8 hurdle, 7 chases)
Chris's Dream - 7 runs (1 PTP, 3 Bumper, 3 hurdle)
Dortmund Park - 6 runs (2 bumper, 4 hurdles)
Carter McKay - 9 runs (2 PTP, 4 bumper, 3 hurdles)
(bored of going down the list now.... will add more / alter this as we get closer to the decs)
Despite all of this, I am not really one to follow the trends because every race/horse is different.... Santini may be sensastional in years to come... however it would put me off that he (and DDG) are the least experienced horses in the field, when this race (much moreso than the Supreme or Ballymore) has had winners who a much more exposed (over 8+ runs)...
Kinloch Brae - you said that it is hardly conculsive that experience is a massive factor... I suppose that depends on where the line is drawn on experience....
If we use the data above for the race though, it looks like 5 runs is the cut off for how much experience you need.... but trends are there to be broken
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kevloaf View PostNumber of runs leading up to winning the Albert Bartlett
2017 - 16/1 - Penhill - 25 runs (18 flat, 7 hurdle)
2016 - 11/1 - Unowhatimeanharry - 17 runs (all hurdles)
2015 - 14/1- Martello Tower - 9 runs- (1 PTP, 2 bumper, 6 hurdles)
2014 - 33/1 - Very Wood - 7 runs - (2 PTP, 1 bumper, 4 hurdles)
2013 - 11/8f - At Fishers Cross - 8 runs (2 bumper, 6 hurdles)
2012 - 7/1 - Brindisi Breeze - 6 runs (2 PTP, 1 bumper, 3 hurdles)
2011 - 15/8f Bobs Worth - 5 runs (2 bumper, 3 hurdles)
2010 - 33/1 - Berties Dream - 15 runs (1 bumper, 14 hurdles)
2009 - 8/1 - Weapon's Amnesty 8/1 - 6 runs (2 bumper, 4 hurdle)
2008 - 9/1 - Nenuphar Collonges 9/1 - 11 runs (3 flat, 8 hurdles)
2007 - 11/8f - Wichita Lineman - 8 runs (4 flat, 4 hurdles)
2006 - 1/1f - Black Jack Kethum - 5 runs (2 bumper, 3 hurdle)
2005 - 9/1 - Moulin Riche - 15 runs (2 flat, 13 hurdle)
Average of 10.5 runs prior to the race for each winner.
2x horses have both won with 5 runs or less (Bobs Worth and Black Jack Kethum - both went off favourite)
All 4 winning favourites had 8 runs or less
Horses with double figures for number of runs have won at 9/1, 9/1, 33/1, 11/1, 16/1
Looking at the runners near the top of the market...
Cracking Smart - 7 runs (1 flat, 6 hurdles)
Santini - 3 runs (1 PTP, 2 hurdle)
Duc Des Genievres - 3 runs (3 hurdles)
Next Destination - 7 runs (1 PTP, 3 bumper, 3 hurdles)
Chef Des Obeaux - 7 runs (3 bumper, 4 hurdles)
Poetic Rhythm - 16 runs (6 PTP, 3 flat, 7 hurdles)
Red River - 4 runs (1 PTP, 3 hurdles)
Mr Whipped - 5 runs (1 PTP, 4 hurdles)
Ballyward - 4 runs (1 PTP, 1 bumper, 2 hurdles)
Calett Mad - 15 runs (8 hurdle, 7 chases)
Chris's Dream - 7 runs (1 PTP, 3 Bumper, 3 hurdle)
Dortmund Park - 6 runs (2 bumper, 4 hurdles)
Carter McKay - 9 runs (2 PTP, 4 bumper, 3 hurdles)
(bored of going down the list now.... will add more / alter this as we get closer to the decs)
Despite all of this, I am not really one to follow the trends because every race/horse is different.... Santini may be sensastional in years to come... however it would put me off that he (and DDG) are the least experienced horses in the field, when this race (much moreso than the Supreme or Ballymore) has had winners who a much more exposed (over 8+ runs)...
Kinloch Brae - you said that it is hardly conculsive that experience is a massive factor... I suppose that depends on where the line is drawn on experience....
If we use the data above for the race though, it looks like 5 runs is the cut off for how much experience you need.... but trends are there to be broken
This stat is pretty strong I would say as there is little doubt that horses become stronger stayers the older and more experienced they get. And this race is about as strong a test of stamina a novice hurdler will get.
But its still about running fastest from start to finish on the day, so the one's that lack a run or two can obviously still win.
If a horse like santini did win then it would probably put it in a very good light for future races.
Comment
-
Originally posted by quevega View Postexcellent work mate, I thought I had nowt else to do.
This stat is pretty strong I would say as there is little doubt that horses become stronger stayers the older and more experienced they get. And this race is about as strong a test of stamina a novice hurdler will get.
But its still about running fastest from start to finish on the day, so the one's that lack a run or two can obviously still win.
If a horse like santini did win then it would probably put it in a very good light for future races.
2017 Albert Bartlett
1st - Penhill - 25 starts
2nd - Monalee - 7 runs (1 PT, 2 bumper, 4 hurdles)
3rd - Wholestone - 8 runs (1 bumper, 7 hurdles)
4th - Constantine Bay - 5 runs (2 PTP, 3 hurdles)
5th - Ami Debois - 14 runs (3 bumper, 11 hurdles)
6th - Augusta Kate - 7 runs (5 flat, 2 hurdles)
7th - Elegant Escape - 5 runs (1 PTP, 4 hurdles)
8th - Tommy Rapper - 6 runs (2 bumper, 4 hurdles)
9th - Step Back - 9 runs (8 PTP, 1 hurdle)
10th - C'est Jersy - 7 runs (3 bumper, 4 hurdles)
11th - Baden - 7 runs (1 PTP, 6 hurdles)
Fell - The Worlds End - 6 runs (1 PTP, 1 bumper, 4 hurdles)
PU - Turcagua - 8 runs (4 bumper, 4 hurdles)
PU - Any Drama - 8 runs (4 bumper, 5 hurdles)
UR - Death Duty - 9 runs (1 PTP, 4 bumpers, 4 hurdles)Last edited by Kevloaf; 3 March 2018, 01:09 PM.
Comment
-
Poetic Rhythm - 16 runs (6 PTP, 3 flat, 7 hurdles) is starting to look a nice e/w bet at 16/1? I looked at him in december but thought he has run a lot but not over 3 miles, but looking back at 2015/16 he was only running over 3 miles I think they have been running him at the wrong distance the past two years.. might put a small saver on him..
Comment
Comment