I was watching last week's Road to Cheltenham with Hislop and Walsh and they briefly put up a table showing the prices of the leading contenders for the King George VI Chase and the Cheltenham Gold Cup side by side and I was struck by how the ratio between the two prices varied:
M Indo 5/1, 6/1
C House 6/1, 12/1
E Allen 7/1, 8/1
Allaho 8/1, 16/1
R Pag 16/1, 40/1
E De Rom 16/1, 50/1
A De For 16/1, 25.1
AB Photo 20/1, 16/1
(The two Nicholls horses aren't quoted for The Gold Cup)
I wasn't sure whether this was because of current ideas about whether they will run or not; or how they are thought to be suited by each race.
I also thought that Al Boum should surely be a shorter price for the King George than the 3 horses above him in the list. (too old?)
Anyway it got me thinking about how the trends for the two races varies. Of course, course experience relates to the two different courses but most of the trends are similar as you'd expect for a Grade 1 staying chase: grade 1 form, experience over the course, distance (not too much), recent good form, official rating etc
There's a trend against Gold Cup horses having more than 3 previous season runs or running on heavy ground in the same season. Higher priced horses do marginally better in the Gold Cup.
But there is one glaring difference: previous winners have a much better record in the King George.
17 out of the last 40 KGs have been won by a previous winner but only 4 of the last 40 GCs - that's quite a difference.
Both Frodon and Clan Des Obeaux fall outside the favoured 6-8 age bracket though.