Flat related but would appreciate people’s views… I have Military Order in Saturday’s Lingfield Derby trial at the end of an ante post treble and the first 2 legs have won… because Saturday’s race has been switched to the all weather and the race has been reopened, Unibet have voided the third leg and settled the bet. I thought ante post rules only voided such a bet on a venue change? …I would much prefer the bet to stand even though I don’t know for sure that MO will still be running… thoughts?
● Entries are
reopened for all Lingfield races
(the otiginal entries have gone/disappeared)
● Ran on the synthetic surface
● Ran over a different trip
● void antepost bets and refund
● on the BHA website the races are all opened for NEW race entries today (none carried forward)
It's logical for them to void the antepost bets and give people their money back than suggest everyone's bets rolls on to the new entries, on the different trip and track, with new runners to race against.
I imagine some would be gutted if their antepost bets were rolled on like that and then their horse didn't get entered (or was marked as a loser).
You have your money back to bet MO if he does get entered again now. :encouragement:
To be fair the fixture was abandoned 3 days before the race.
It didnt even make it to final Declarations.
So it wasn't certain that Military Order, or any other particular horse, would get declared today, as we hadn't reached declaration stage before the meeting was abandoned.
Most abandonments of meetings usually make it past 48 hour decs, so we knew what the final fields and draw were.
And the bookies would've won on any antepost bets on those horses that didn't make final decs and kept punters money.
Military Order, Gooloogong etc, didn't get declared to run.
Money back is very fair.
Good luck with your new plan with the winnings :encouragement: