Regarding myself, I touched upon some of the questions here soon after the festival so i'll try not to repeat too much:
http://www.fatjockey.com/forum/showthread.php?15283-Up-or-down&p=110778#post110778
Certainly won't be as interesting a read as Kev. Laying out the whole week, with the stakes involved was fascinating really but my take...
1. How did you get on?
2019
Up by 59pts
46% ROI
Compares to previous years of:
2018
Up by 163pts
81.5% ROI
2017
Up by 25pts
37.3% ROI
2016
Up by 25pts
111.8% ROI
So i've had better seasons in terms of ROI but still more than happy. I had 2 very small antepost years before this but they were so minimal in relation I ignore them.
2. Will you all be continuing with ante post next year? / Will your approach change for 2019?
Continuing, absolutely. Actually struggled to give last season a proper go so will have my head in the game again next season.
Will my approach change; yes and no...i'll come back to this at the very end...
3. How did the yankees/multiples/ lucky 15's/placepots etc do for all?
Only 1 multiple landed which is pretty shocking, that one being a Min and Envoi Allen DRF going onto Altior and Tiger Roll at the festival. That 1 winning fourfold meant I finished +4pts on multiples. Looking back at the 2 years prior (barely did any in 2016):
2018 +87 pts
2017 +5 pts
But it'll be something I continue. 2019 and 2017 were disappointing with the returns only just outweighing the stakes but with these bets it only takes 1 or 2 horses for the outcome to shift dramatically. Benie des Dieux being the primary 'tipping point' this year which was extremely unlucky. For me the reward in these outweigh the risk and despite the slightly subdued viewpoint on 2/3 years, they've still been in profit.
4. What advice or lessons can be learnt from this year (ante post and/or on the day)
I've just been reading back the first post I did on this in 2017 after my first year on the forum. Kev mentions it in his post but giving the
favourite or fancied horses on their attempt at a race continues was something flagged 2 years ago. Really does make it a worthwhile thing to look back on these threads again as the season starts / progresses and the festival looms closer.
(Not ones i'm necessarily agreeing with or think but...) Horses that could apply next season:
Give Me A Copper (Ultima)
Uradel (Coral)
Footpad (Ryanair)
Janika (Plate) (unlikely due to OR)
Whiskey Sour (County)
Presenting Percy (Gold Cup)

Stand Up and Fight (Foxhunters)
Magic Saint (Grand Annual)
'Top' Jockeys - both Le Breuil and Any Second Now I passed up despite having arguably 2 of the best amateur jockeys the festival has witnessed. Even more unbelievably, I had backed Kilfrum Cross in the Kim Muir
almost purely on the booking of Derek O'Connor. To then cash out that bet and NOT back Any Second Now...just plain stupidly...enough said on that one... You just have to back the horses that these 2 are riding even if you feel the horses form may not justify it imo.
Cash Out - Only 3 of these backfired to varying degrees for me throughout the season.
1.
Envoi Allen. As per us all. This really was unlucky though. He won on Sunday 2nd December when GE confirmed he wouldn't run at the festival. On Monday 3rd December just the very next day Malone Road was ruled out. Now if that setback to MR had been announced just 12 or so hours earlier i'm sure everyone and certainly for myself i'd have left the 33/1 bet rolling. So it added extra insult. Perhaps we need to start treating Elliott with the same cautionary stance at Willie Mullins. For me i'm still inclined to take GE at his word for now though.
2.
Vinndication. As per EA - going on the trainers word I cashed out 3 bets at 33/1 for the JLT. Only to see him line up at much shorter odds. It turned out he didn't challenge the front pair so no harm done but would have been a kick in the teeth if he had of done so!
3.
Kilfrum Cross. As pointed out in (4) above. Backed on the basis of Derek O'Connor riding. He then ran a blinder in second. The EW bet would have landed if I had of kept the bet. (And Brought back slight shades of deja vu with the result of Nativer River being done by JP's Minella Rocco - if you believe that DO'C had the provisional ride on KC then again his choice justified by a fine margin)
So from those 3 bets, I would have had a winner and a second place. BUT the opportunity of Cash Out is 100% a positive still and these 3 stand up little against the amount of successful cashed out bets. Every cash out ended up being backed on another horse but the flexibility it offers, especially at the early stage of the season is a huge help. I know Ista is one of few that doesn't have this luxury of a bet365 account and it's one i'll continue to be happy to use whilst I can. I'll continue to within reason trust a trainer on targets as well next year despite those 2 examples.
5. Your biggest mistakes / The races/horses you got wrong
Firstly my biggest mistake is not always looking back at previous festivals throughout the year and taking what i've learnt onboard. Far too easy to get swept away and take in new information without going back over the old. But a few to note...
1.
Sire du Berlais. Missed his price. Stubbornness to not back him despite an obvious plot at a short price. Could have got 6/1 the night before but didn't have time to look that evening. Went off 4/1. 40 minutes earlier I was snapping the 3/1 up on Defi du Seuil. The JLT of course was basically a 2 horse match so comparing it to a 24 runner handicap isn't fair but a 4/1 winner still shouldn't be passed up. Should have at the very least gone in a multiple or two.
2.
Frodon. Got plenty of races wrong but this was the one I really didn't see. Never thought he could be a grade 1 winner at the festival. I'm still not quite sold on him. And still look back thinking if Road to Respect had of just jumped a clear round...but he beat them all fair and square. Super horse. Not sure i'll ever get him right.
3.
4 Miler. I very rarely back more than 2 or 3 horses per race. One of the few races that I tend to break this trend on is the 4 miler due to getting the jockey bookings down. This ended up a disaster. Bacardys was a project for this race all Winter for me that never materialised. And Mall Dini wasn't entered. Despite those 2 non runners I went into the race with Ok Corral, Ballyward, Discorama and Jerrysback at super prices. Ballyward had a horrible fatal fall. Ok Corral couldn't get near them and Discorama and Jerrysback were backed Win Only. Add to that just a horrible race to watch. Now having the top 3 in the market at big prices IS 100% a good way to play the race. So I just have to take the result on the chin. Repeat that kind of selections (as most on here did) and i'll be up more than down but I really should have backed EW and covered Jamie Codd's ride. For a race that I backed 6 runners in to get no returns though is poor no matter how I spin it
2. (continued) Will your approach change for 2019?
Most probably, yes.
For the 2018 Festival I made a point to back more EW shots, something that I was very much against the years before. That ended up being my best year yet. I swayed back towards Win only for the majority of my bets for 2019 for various reasons - mainly a lack of funds and focus. There's obviously more than 1 factor to why 2018 was so good for me but it may not be coincidence that it occurred after backing more EW shots. I can note plenty of horses who if I had kept that approach would have come in this year in the places. So I
really should be looking at more EW bets I feel for next season.
I feel like i'm on a never ending routine of house renovation which takes up a lot of funds that could otherwise be used towards this. But I will be able to increase my overall stake again. And based on the 4 years prior I feel it is justified to do so. I have no issue admitting I probably have a lot less of an overall stake than most on the forum but would like to make the next step up so to speak. A question for all, how did you approach this, if you did?
- The obvious would be to just back my opinion stronger by increasing my stake to say 2pts a selection.
- The alternative is to back more horses. Not in the sense of creating a book - but just being more flexible through the season on multiple horses. As noted earlier on, I pretty much always back 2-3 horses a race. A look at 2019 shows my singles inc. NR's were: (any race also included)
Supreme - 6 backed / 6 runners (WH offer inflated this)
Arkle - 4 / 0
Ultima - 2
CH - 2 / 1
Mares 0
NHC - 6 / 4
Close Bros - 3 / 3
Ballymore - 3 backed / 2 runners
RSA - 4 / 4
Coral - 3 / 3
CC - 1 / 1
XC - 2 / 2
FW - 3 / 3
Bumper - 1 / 0
JLT - 4 backed / 2 runners
Pertemps - 2 / 2
Ryanair - 4 / 3
Stayers - 4 / 3
Plate - 2 / 2
Mares Nov - 1 / 1
Kim Muir - 3 / 2
Triumph - 3 backed / 2 runners
County - 2 / 2
AB - 2 / 2
Gold Cup - 3 / 3
Foxhunter - 1 / 1
MP - 1 / 1
GA - 2 / 2
And there's plenty of times through the season where i'll want or be tempted to back a horse but hold off. So instead of backing say the same selections much stronger, instead spread the selections out.
Of course much will depend on what horses I fancy. Another factor between the difference between 2018 and 2019 festivals for me was just that I had a stronger opionion on a selection of horses than I did last yeatr. So it'll certainly be fluid and not set in stone.
I'm thinking a mix between the 2 but interested to hear opinions...