• HELP US - Become a Patron - Fat Jockey is a horse racing community focused on all the big races in the UK and Ireland. We don't charge users but if you have found the site useful then any support towards the running costs is appreciated ... a small donation each month would be a huge contribution. Become a Patron!

2026 Champion Hurdle

You maybe right or it might just be for the National given its profile. This year Double Powerful has Unseated, Fallen and Unseated in 3 consecutive starts but been allowed to continue without any intervention that I am aware of.

But if ever a horse needed investigating its surely CH given i) his profile and ii) his mistakes appear random and catastrophic
They are horrific to be fair. He isn't just clipping the top bar and landing nicely on his shoulder and side. He is in leg breaking territory and certainly neck breaking with how he has been falling
 
  • Like
Reactions: Prestbury
Some good posts on here, fully agree with Quevega and Prestbury,

Why on earth didn't they just run in the Kingwell? Surely that is a better way of getting his confidence back, by jumping hurdles in a race, than what it is running in a flat race.

As to going straight to Cheltenham without another race over hurdles, as I pointed out in an earlier post, it is a potential PR disaster for Henderson and Racing in general if the worst was to happen. By risking potential injury to the horse on the second biggest stage reeks of greed. If they wanted to test him out then the Kingwell, with a smaller crowd and less publicity would surely of been a better option than the Cheltenham Festival.
 
Or just do what mullins did with kopek and do a circuit round a track with a couple of stablemates

Get a few jumps in at his own pace to get a bit of confidence
 
  • Like
Reactions: opatcho
Some good posts on here, fully agree with Quevega and Prestbury,

Why on earth didn't they just run in the Kingwell? Surely that is a better way of getting his confidence back, by jumping hurdles in a race, than what it is running in a flat race.

As to going straight to Cheltenham without another race over hurdles, as I pointed out in an earlier post, it is a potential PR disaster for Henderson and Racing in general if the worst was to happen. By risking potential injury to the horse on the second biggest stage reeks of greed. If they wanted to test him out then the Kingwell, with a smaller crowd and less publicity would surely of been a better option than the Cheltenham Festival.
Because they're a circus act trying to drum up engagement for the horse. I think deep down Hendo knows he's finished too and wants to have one final pop at a Champion Hurdle with him so his approach is to find a race he can't lose (ignore the fact it's a deep enough race now) that the BHA put on for you and then he can go to Chelt on the back of it. But it's boring and to be honest the more the media discuss it, the more it feeds Hendo and Buckley's egos.
 
Because they're a circus act trying to drum up engagement for the horse. I think deep down Hendo knows he's finished too and wants to have one final pop at a Champion Hurdle with him so his approach is to find a race he can't lose (ignore the fact it's a deep enough race now) that the BHA put on for you and then he can go to Chelt on the back of it. But it's boring and to be honest the more the media discuss it, the more it feeds Hendo and Buckley's egos.
To be honest it’s getting a bit boring reading about it in here, although understandable cos it’s all a tad bizarre imo.
Rather just leave it now and see how it all pans out.
 
To be honest it’s getting a bit boring reading about it in here, although understandable cos it’s all a tad bizarre imo.
Rather just leave it now and see how it all pans out.
I find it hard to have any interest in the horse because I find the situation ridiculous. Which is a shame - I was there when he won the Supreme and he's the best hurdler of my lifetime. But it's been boring since he won the Champion Hurdle, from the GC comments to the lack of runs the season after, to this debacle now
 
They have bent over for Constitution Hill......

14 runners now not 12
Yes, 12 runners and he had virtually no chance of running. What's the betting that two come out? Is anyone actually calling this out? Totally wrong to give one horse preferential treatment. I don't expect much if he does run.
 
Yes, 12 runners and he had virtually no chance of running. What's the betting that two come out? Is anyone actually calling this out? Totally wrong to give one horse preferential treatment. I don't expect much if he does run.
He's the only reason the race took place in the first place so he should have been given a bye imo.

1 has pulled out already so just 1 more to give a back hander to. Simples.

The 1/3 Betfair were offering him just getting in won't be there any more for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carnage at Taunton
He's the only reason the race took place in the first place so he should have been given a bye imo.
Are you being serious - this isn't tennis. Wasn't the race always taking place, but extra prize money was added?
 
Are you being serious - this isn't tennis. Wasn't the race always taking place, but extra prize money was added?
Was under the impression it was stuck in there late for CH?
 
Are you being serious - this isn't tennis. Wasn't the race always taking place, but extra prize money was added?

The race existed, it was a midweek contest, the BHA brought it forward to the friday evening in exchange for the additional sponsorship from SBK, its mostly covered in the link above :)
 
Thought so. Moved/re designed specifically for CH
 

The race existed, it was a midweek contest, the BHA brought it forward to the friday evening in exchange for the additional sponsorship from SBK, its mostly covered in the link above :)

I don't think it's that much of a stretch to think SBK put something in the sponsorship conditions about Constitution Hill running, and now the BHA / Arc need to make it happen...

Although oddly enough the discussion of him not running is probably generating as much publicity as the race itself would.
 
I don't think it's that much of a stretch to think SBK put something in the sponsorship conditions about Constitution Hill running, and now the BHA / Arc need to make it happen...

Although oddly enough the discussion of him not running is probably generating as much publicity as the race itself would.
Can you elaborate - surely they can't say we will only sponsor if a certain horse runs?
 
Can you elaborate - surely they can't say we will only sponsor if a certain horse runs?

I agree you'd like to think they couldn't but there's a lot of things you'd like to think don't happen in racing.

When adding £40k or whatever to an already in place agreement it wouldn't be unreasonable for the sponsor to what some supplemental conditions added to the agreement. It would almost be naive from SBK to throw £40k at it without some conditions imo.

The whole circus has surrounded Constitution Hill.