benkneale03
Previous Lurker
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2016
- Messages
- 19
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
I've watched Alan king's criq Rock closely all season and when it beat bags groove I thought it had showed everything you want from a bumper type. Decent turn of foot, travelled well and had the gears to go through the field and then the most important bit, he proved he can fight off the bridle which is a massive for me as plenty will come here after mopping up easy races.
After criq rocks run the other week I did think it was barely put in the race but thought it might have been a bit of pocket talking until I seen quotes from king to say it missed newbury on the 13th due to a bad scope and had actually been on antibiotics. It seemed to make sense then - they had a month to get it ready and had said for months it needs a run. The race he went in now seems like it was thrown in for the experience being the only race it could go in to leave enough time to recover from the medication and then the run in time for cheltenham.
Hutchison Hadnt made a move 3 out the other week in a race that was always going to suit front runners from the off. Compare it to when he beat bags groove when he began making a move 6 out!
He gave bags groove 7lbs there and bags groove has just franked that massively, pulling clear with one he was conceding 8lbs too. That winner of ellisons brought decent form and that race had to be ok considering kings favourite was backed and the yard have won 3 of the last 7. Henderson also had a second season bumper which should hint at ability and greatrex had one that hosed up last time.
On form lines and ignoring criqs last run there's an argument to say he could well have set the standard when beating bags groove so I think he's huge at 33/1.
Since 2006 king has only had 2 runners in this race and one was yanworth so I'm hoping the trouble they've gone through with this is a hint in itself. There's no way a horse runs within 2 weeks of antibiotics under normal circumstances.
After criq rocks run the other week I did think it was barely put in the race but thought it might have been a bit of pocket talking until I seen quotes from king to say it missed newbury on the 13th due to a bad scope and had actually been on antibiotics. It seemed to make sense then - they had a month to get it ready and had said for months it needs a run. The race he went in now seems like it was thrown in for the experience being the only race it could go in to leave enough time to recover from the medication and then the run in time for cheltenham.
Hutchison Hadnt made a move 3 out the other week in a race that was always going to suit front runners from the off. Compare it to when he beat bags groove when he began making a move 6 out!
He gave bags groove 7lbs there and bags groove has just franked that massively, pulling clear with one he was conceding 8lbs too. That winner of ellisons brought decent form and that race had to be ok considering kings favourite was backed and the yard have won 3 of the last 7. Henderson also had a second season bumper which should hint at ability and greatrex had one that hosed up last time.
On form lines and ignoring criqs last run there's an argument to say he could well have set the standard when beating bags groove so I think he's huge at 33/1.
Since 2006 king has only had 2 runners in this race and one was yanworth so I'm hoping the trouble they've gone through with this is a hint in itself. There's no way a horse runs within 2 weeks of antibiotics under normal circumstances.