riccirich
New member
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2018
- Messages
- 1,349
- Reaction score
- 456
- Points
- 0
I don't want to speak for everyone, but the laying off side of it I doubt will be for many on here.
It would be a nice to have. For those that want to.
But I think there may be enough interest to have an organised team bet each week anyway, for fun.
If people can get to lay them off then that's up to the individual, but I'd imagine most won't bother or have the means or inclination to do so.
Like I said previously I think the winner stays on method (short stints) would help keep the majority interested, cos even if amongst losing spells we'd have someone new having a go each week.
I don't think the free hit will apply to the majority as explained above.
See what others say, but I'd gladly join in. For a laugh.
Got to be at least as good as my usual flat season form.
Which for most years seems to be trying to lose all Cheltenham, Aintree and Punchestown profits by the Chester May meeting.:highly_amused:
A lot of points were on the premise that the majority would be laying off for a free hit weekly once the price crashes. But if that is problematic and won't be a big part of it, then a lot of my points can be disregarded.
When I was saying a multiple week stint for the one person, that was if we would be selecting a high priced horse whose price would be easier to crash, in which case i was think each person would like more than one go at it given its difficulty. But I would agree with the one week per person and you stay on if your selection wins or places, if we're selecting 8/1 shots for example.
I still think a minimum price limit would be a good idea. Would seem like a lot of fuss over nothing if people are putting up 4/1 shots. Something like a juicy 16/1 minimum price I think would be a bit more exciting.