The Beast
Banned
How anyone can pick holes with a horse that is 7/7 is weird. Until he is beaten he has no flaws.
How anyone can pick holes with a horse that is 7/7 is weird. Until he is beaten he has no flaws.
How anyone can pick holes with a horse that is 7/7 is weird. Until he is beaten he has no flaws.
I'm struggling to fathom how you could use so few words and be so spectacularly wrong
From a betting perspective it always comes back to value, and a horse that's 7/7 equals a price of 5/4. Any horse (let alone novice) that short at Cheltenham should be picked at because every horse has 'holes', no horse is flawless and every horse is beatable, even more so at the most competitive race meet of the entire season, and at a place that's historically proven to be a wasteland for the proverbial certainty.
And that's from the Voice of reason deputy.
OBJECTION and don’t dare overrule :highly_amused:
That’s me
Psychopant pant pant :highly_amused:
I'm struggling to fathom how you could use so few words and be so spectacularly wrong
From a betting perspective it always comes back to value, and a horse that's 7/7 equals a price of 5/4. Any horse (let alone novice) that short at Cheltenham should be picked at because every horse has 'holes', no horse is flawless and every horse is beatable, even more so at the most competitive race meet of the entire season, and at a place that's historically proven to be a wasteland for the proverbial certainty.
Im struggling Charlie:highly_amused:Where do I compare him to betting please.
I am purely stating his spectacular form figures.And like it or not he is flawless to date correct , yes or no!.
You best goggle Frankels form figures to help you out before you reply , I hear Ballydoyle still working out how to beat the great horse:encouragement:
Or is there a certain number of runs unbeaten when you reach perfection ?
Im struggling Charlie:highly_amused:Where do I compare him to betting please.
I am purely stating his spectacular form figures.And like it or not he is flawless to date correct , yes or no!.
You best goggle Frankels form figures to help you out before you reply , I hear Ballydoyle still working out how to beat the great horse:encouragement:
Frankel wasn't flawless.
He was too keen at least once and didn't alway settle.
He was still the best thing ever....but not flawless.[/QUOTE
:witless:Ive been dry all January , im seriously tempted.
Get yourself a rum Beasty boy. You're not thinking clearly
#DrinkResponsibly
Im struggling Charlie:highly_amused:Where do I compare him to betting please.
I am purely stating his spectacular form figures.And like it or not he is flawless to date correct , yes or no!.
You best goggle Frankels form figures to help you out before you reply , I hear Ballydoyle still working out how to beat the great horse:encouragement:
As figures 1111111 is flawless, but that doesn't make him a flawless horse, nor does it make his form spectacular. Surely you see that right? Bringing Frankel into a Cheltenham debate in January :highly_amused:
:encouragement: Definately clear in mind but getting impression the forum has a few artists in the ranks:applause:
You brought up all horses are beatable , purely showing you your wrong Charles:encouragement:
I Wouldn't dare. Mr Pie.
You can self proclaim anything on here.
(you've just made me google Peter Simon)
born in Sheffield like me, and last seen slagging off UK based Polish and Latvians on the Ideal World shopping channel,
Preferred him on Double Dare though.
Ok, I'm wrong and you are right. Envoi Allen is unbeatable, flawless and spectacular. Good luck pal :applause: