Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Crowdfunder - Fat Jockey Forum upgrade

Hello Fat Jockeys,

Upgrading the Fat Jockey forum!: https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/p/fatjockeyforum

We're looking to upgrade the 'hosting CPU' so I've set up a crowdfunding project.

I would love it if you could donate using the link below to access my project page. Any contribution large or small will be hugely appreciated. Thank you.

Kevloaf @ Fat Jockey
2 of 2 < >

Fat Jockey Patrons

HELP US - Become a Patron - Fat Jockey is a horse racing community focused on all the big races in the UK and Ireland. We don't charge users but if you have found the site useful then any support towards the running costs is appreciated ... a small donation each month would be a huge contribution.
Become a Patron!
See more
See less

Arkle/Marsh/RSA/NH Chase - Novice Chasers 2021 (new)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    It's tough to know where Tizzard would end up placing a novice chaser. You couldn't rule out the Marsh, Arkle or RSA for Fiddlerontheroof given connections. I'd have them in the order I've listed them.

    33/1 Marsh and 40/1 Arkle both fair enough with 365 - I'd anticipate him being shorter for both after chase debut.

    Not adding myself now as it's still April but if these prices held until Sept I'd do it.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Kevloaf
      It's tough to know where Tizzard would end up placing a novice chaser. You couldn't rule out the Marsh, Arkle or RSA for Fiddlerontheroof given connections. I'd have them in the order I've listed them.

      33/1 Marsh and 40/1 Arkle both fair enough with 365 - I'd anticipate him being shorter for both after chase debut.

      Not adding myself now as it's still April but if these prices held until Sept I'd do it.
      ....only 20-1 (before boost) in the Hills any race market.

      Comment


      • #18
        I like fiddlerontheroof as an arkle horse think he showed a lovely turn of foot in the tolworth and he is definetly better then what he showed at cheltenham

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Ray
          I like fiddlerontheroof as an arkle horse think he showed a lovely turn of foot in the tolworth and he is definetly better then what he showed at cheltenham
          Not sure that Tolworth win was as good as it looked though Ray?

          The 2nd was walloped next time out 104L
          The 3rd was PU at the festival
          Hang In There was beaten when falling next time out behind Shishkin.
          The Nicholls horse won a couple of weak races at odds on but didn't make the team for Cheltenham?



          Could be a case of another over hyped Tizzard horse?


          I did like the Tolworth myself at the time... with the limited evidence we've got though he might just be flattered by it?

          Comment


          • #20
            His losing form is probably better, not unlike Abacadabras. Always worth considering each way but these decent 'professional losers' aren't win only material.

            Comment


            • #21
              When you put it like that!

              But tizzard didnt have the best festival so maybe didnt have his nags at there peak

              I just think that although the form hasnt worked out very well from the tolworth i remember thinking on the day that when he jumps a fence hes going to look really good and if i was to put him in any race right now it would be an arkle..
              If im getting excited about anyone though its Fury Road i think the further the better for him so maybe jumping a fence will be perfect he would be my fancy for the RSA at this time

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Kevloaf
                Not sure that Tolworth win was as good as it looked though Ray?

                The 2nd was walloped next time out 104L
                The 3rd was PU at the festival
                Hang In There was beaten when falling next time out behind Shishkin.
                The Nicholls horse won a couple of weak races at odds on but didn't make the team for Cheltenham?



                Could be a case of another over hyped Tizzard horse?


                I did like the Tolworth myself at the time... with the limited evidence we've got though he might just be flattered by it?
                I think they have done very well to get a Grade 1 out if him. He got the best ride in the Supreme and it was still a shocking effort.

                These days not so sure that those slogs up the Sandown hill convert into Festival winners.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by archie
                  His losing form is probably better, not unlike Abacadabras. Always worth considering each way but these decent 'professional losers' aren't win only material.
                  Yeah it can be an overlooked angle at times. I find myself looking for it quite often but I find it's a more useful tool week-to-week than for ante post. It's very rare a horse would win a festival graded race after being proven inferior to another rival (with Abacadabras again being a good example).

                  Originally posted by Ray
                  When you put it like that!

                  But tizzard didnt have the best festival so maybe didnt have his nags at there peak

                  I just think that although the form hasnt worked out very well from the tolworth i remember thinking on the day that when he jumps a fence hes going to look really good and if i was to put him in any race right now it would be an arkle..
                  If im getting excited about anyone though its Fury Road i think the further the better for him so maybe jumping a fence will be perfect he would be my fancy for the RSA at this time
                  Tizzy not having the best festival seems to be a theme, unless he's got a top notcher.
                  No doubts he can handle a top horse (where they campaign themselves essentially) but I'd be wary of any of his horses for Cheltenham. Wary might be the wrong word or a little strong but I certainly don't think he's the superpower he's made out to be!

                  Originally posted by kinloch brae
                  I think they have done very well to get a Grade 1 out if him. He got the best ride in the Supreme and it was still a shocking effort.

                  These days not so sure that those slogs up the Sandown hill convert into Festival winners.
                  It is an interesting read through winners and past winners, without too much effort you could make a case for it being a decent guide but you can also bash in quite easily.

                  I lean towards removing Yorkhill from the list as it's just not likely we'd see an Irish raider win it in the coming years as Willie won't have the luxury he had that season again as long as Gordon keeps him honest in Ireland.

                  It does look a weak grade 1 looking back. I remember not being confident beforehand which of the 3 main market hopes would be the winner

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Kevloaf
                    Yeah it can be an overlooked angle at times. I find myself looking for it quite often but I find it's a more useful tool week-to-week than for ante post. It's very rare a horse would win a festival graded race after being proven inferior to another rival (with Abacadabras again being a good example).



                    Tizzy not having the best festival seems to be a theme, unless he's got a top notcher.
                    No doubts he can handle a top horse (where they campaign themselves essentially) but I'd be wary of any of his horses for Cheltenham. Wary might be the wrong word or a little strong but I certainly don't think he's the superpower he's made out to be!



                    It is an interesting read through winners and past winners, without too much effort you could make a case for it being a decent guide but you can also bash in quite easily.

                    I lean towards removing Yorkhill from the list as it's just not likely we'd see an Irish raider win it in the coming years as Willie won't have the luxury he had that season again as long as Gordon keeps him honest in Ireland.

                    It does look a weak grade 1 looking back. I remember not being confident beforehand which of the 3 main market hopes would be the winner
                    The one I remember recently in terms of future festival is the Summerville boy and Kalashnikov tolworth but as for the supreme that year, it does look like that was a poor year.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Craigy14
                      The one I remember recently in terms of future festival is the Summerville boy and Kalashnikov tolworth but as for the supreme that year, it does look like that was a poor year.
                      Yes that was a strong year for the Tolworth - but zooming out a bit, looks like an exception rather than the rule in terms of Supreme winner perhaps.


                      Every race (and horse) deserve to be considered regardless, but it's a starting point!

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Kevloaf View Post
                        Yeah it can be an overlooked angle at times. I find myself looking for it quite often but I find it's a more useful tool week-to-week than for ante post. It's very rare a horse would win a festival graded race after being proven inferior to another rival (with Abacadabras again being a good example).



                        Tizzy not having the best festival seems to be a theme, unless he's got a top notcher.
                        No doubts he can handle a top horse (where they campaign themselves essentially) but I'd be wary of any of his horses for Cheltenham. Wary might be the wrong word or a little strong but I certainly don't think he's the superpower he's made out to be!



                        It is an interesting read through winners and past winners, without too much effort you could make a case for it being a decent guide but you can also bash in quite easily.

                        I lean towards removing Yorkhill from the list as it's just not likely we'd see an Irish raider win it in the coming years as Willie won't have the luxury he had that season again as long as Gordon keeps him honest in Ireland.

                        It does look a weak grade 1 looking back. I remember not being confident beforehand which of the 3 main market hopes would be the winner
                        From a punting point of view worth mentioning that following Tizzard blind at the Aintree has paid, havent got the figures to hand but his record there is very good, not sure if this is intentional or just one of those things.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Hardy Eustace
                          After he won the Tolworth Tizzard said he’ll go over fences next year. I don’t imagine his run in the supreme will have changed anything.

                          “A lot will depend on the ground,” Tizzard said. “I’m sure he’ll have an entry in the [two-mile] Supreme and the two-and-a-half [Ballymore Novice Hurdle]. We’ve also got Master Debonair for the Supreme as well [as recent Newbury winner The Big Breakaway] so we’re spoilt for choice and that’s beautiful for our yard going forward, the novice hurdlers are our future.
                          “They’re three very good horses and I can’t wait to jump a fence with him [Fiddlerontheroof] next year. We had Elixir [De Nutz] who won this race last year and he never made it to Cheltenham, so it’s a case of getting them all there and then it’s a lovely problem to have.”


                          https://www.theguardian.com/sport/20...n-horse-racing
                          Great , Thank's H.E . I have fiddler backed for the Ch. hdl and the arkle ,might bin the ch hdl and add marsh.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            I’ve said on here before that I think Tizzard is massively overrated as a trainer.

                            The story of farmer to trainer seemed to blind people into seemingly thinking he’s in the top 5 trainers but he just really isn’t in my view.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by billymag
                              From a punting point of view worth mentioning that following Tizzard blind at the Aintree has paid, havent got the figures to hand but his record there is very good, not sure if this is intentional or just one of those things.
                              Down to some big priced (or unfancied) horses from memory?


                              I think the "Tizzard Aintree" factor is overbet as well now as it's well highlighted over the last few years...

                              Small data samples though (and no sample this year!)

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Ultragold popping up at 50/1 in the Topham then following up the year after at 14s with the bonus of the 1-2 thanks to Shananhan's Turn certainly boosted his level stakes stats for the meeting. Often well found his runners in such races now even at the other meets at Aintree but was good while it lasted.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X