Good stats their Prestbury
Especially those lines of numbers, would have sent me into overdrive with the OCD.
I've repeated many times on here that Willies horses have to earn their way up the pecking order so novices often (almost always) have to win a maiden first before considering a step up in grade. This is particularly useful when trying to second guess who he will run in the mass of entries he puts into the graded races early in the season. It'll be much easier to work them out when you look at his usual MO.
As your stats show, if they don't win on their first attempt in a maiden it is a lot less likely that they will be his first string come March.
As they've basically missed a step.
The Dublin grade 1's are the key as some that come out in November and get beat are often given another shot around Xmas and New Year and then he lets them have a go at the grade 1's in Dublin. Ballyburn is a good example of this.
I also think that most on here know by now that based on the form of the horses at home, (injuries, ground issues and setbacks aside), he is more likely to start his better prospects at Xmas, as he's more confident of them winning first time up. And the spacing/freshness works better for him.
The problem with these sorts of things though, is that there will always be anomalies.
And there will always be plenty that want to back the anomaly.
It really does pay to play the ones that have shown form in graded races though, as this is rarely proven wrong. As per your numbers.
For example, it's more sensible to back a first time maiden winner who then wins/places in graded company for Willie than a horse that goes into Cheltenham having been beaten in a maiden and/or only having won a maiden (even if impressively)
If you really think about it, all the above is obvious as fuck. And anyone who doesn't play antepost, but are serious players who only bet on race week, would think we were daft to ever think otherwise.
But due to the knowledge and discussion on here for months around every novice horse in training with Willie, the issue for many is hanging on to the early promise or stable talk/rumours, and not letting go, when the stats and actual form on the track tell you to cut/fuck them off.
Lets face it, a lot on here are desperate to be the one to have found the golden nugget and mentioned it before anyone else. When it doesn't really matter. And that can lead to holding on just a bit too much for your own good.
Problem is there will always be the one that got away.
Best to write down and keep a note of all the ones you let go that ended up losers I reckon and this will help ease the pain of the odd one that you let slip through. The losers list will be more than sufficient to outweigh the odd winner in the long term I can guarantee that.
The harsh truth is that it is rare that the ones at home that look the best, prove to be the best.
So much better to go on the actual form.
Back to the subject of horses earning their way up the ladder....
It's pretty much the same with his older established horses also, They have to do it in the track or else another steps up in their place.
Willie rewards success like any successful person.
Although many found it frustrating at the time (me included) this is pretty much the main reason why Lossie did not run in the Champion hurdle in 2025. She simply did not do enough that year to earn a shot, and he had another (State Man) who was ahead of her in his eyes.
There were obviously other factors at play here also, as were discussed at length many times on here. (Guilty as charged

)
Then he also has his elite horses that can really do no wrong. Until another one makes the grade and takes his/her mantle.
Lossie for State Man
Gaelic for Galopin (RIP

)