Quevega
Fat Jockey Patron (est. Jan 2021) Self-proclaimed
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2018
- Messages
- 21,159
- Reaction score
- 5,760
- Points
- 83
most of my post appears to be missing.
Not suggesting you were attempting to mislead anyone, but your original post mentioned Good ground and not ground with good in the description. Some may have took it at face value, especially coming from you. It also left off the 4th place from last season on goodtosoft
Three of those races you've listed were good to soft, so anyone wanting to produce alternative stats about it preferring soft in the going could own those also.
My main issue is I cannot support the assumption that the horse will improve for good ground as I believe it's form last year was as much down to the rise in class as anything, and connections mentioned the ground as most do, as a form of excuse for it not being the next Big Bucks.
In it's novice season it performed equally well on soft as good, statistically, if not better.
So essentially there are two sides to the story.
I'm taking one side and keeping my money in my pocket with this horse.
Imagine a horse winning 6 on the bounce on good ground and being rated say 140.
Then the owners get ambitious and enter it in grade ones. It runs 6 times in grade ones against horses rated 160ish but on soft ground, and finishes last every time, each time the owners say it didn't like the ground.
It might not just be the ground that explains world's form last year is all I'm saying, and so for it to have gone up from 149 to 155 is also a negative, from a well handicapped point of view
Not suggesting you were attempting to mislead anyone, but your original post mentioned Good ground and not ground with good in the description. Some may have took it at face value, especially coming from you. It also left off the 4th place from last season on goodtosoft
Three of those races you've listed were good to soft, so anyone wanting to produce alternative stats about it preferring soft in the going could own those also.
My main issue is I cannot support the assumption that the horse will improve for good ground as I believe it's form last year was as much down to the rise in class as anything, and connections mentioned the ground as most do, as a form of excuse for it not being the next Big Bucks.
In it's novice season it performed equally well on soft as good, statistically, if not better.
So essentially there are two sides to the story.
I'm taking one side and keeping my money in my pocket with this horse.
Imagine a horse winning 6 on the bounce on good ground and being rated say 140.
Then the owners get ambitious and enter it in grade ones. It runs 6 times in grade ones against horses rated 160ish but on soft ground, and finishes last every time, each time the owners say it didn't like the ground.
It might not just be the ground that explains world's form last year is all I'm saying, and so for it to have gone up from 149 to 155 is also a negative, from a well handicapped point of view