Announcement

Collapse

Fat Jockey Patrons

Fat Jockey is a horse racing community focused on all the big races in the UK and Ireland. We don't charge users but if you have found the site useful then any support towards the running costs is appreciated.
Become a Patron!

You can also make a one-off donation here:
See more
See less

General Chat

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Spectre View Post

    I'm a bit confused about what you're pulling me up on Aaron?

    Going by recent history, focusing on a handful of trainers will find you most of the winners. Going back a decade or more the winners were shared around a much larger number of trainers. Surely my statement is just factual, so I don't know why you want to pick me up on it. Those trainers will still run maybe a hundred or more horses between them, so you've still got to find the winners amongst them, which makes the task harder. But from something like 20% of all the horses running over the four days, they will potentially win 60-70% of the races. Form and the market is a pretty good guide to narrow the list of potential winners down, and by applying a few additional stats and trends the shortlist usually isn't overly long, so you have a fairly good chance of finding a few winners. Making a profit is an entirely different matter.

    On the other subject you raise (which is completely unrelated to the subject), the reason I make a book is not just to find the winners from those handful of stables. I attempt to find all the winners and the places available at the best possible odds. I start very early, with some bets being more than a year in advance, and a high percentage of the rest in the month immediately after the Festival. I then use a combination of cash out to get rid of horses I don't want, and BF to lay horses and take the difference in the price I backed at and the best price i can lay at. That process continues all through the year, and come the Festival itself I hope to have the right horses in my book to fill the places, and that will include adjusting my book to account for extra places that bookmakers will offer. You talk about me having 27 horses backed in the first three races, but that's exactly the point at this stage. I want the possibles backed at the best possible prices, and by doing so I have options, none of which are bad. I won't have that number backed still in March, but I will possibly have 60% of that still, many of which I'll have laid the win part for a profit, leaving good odds on some just running for the place. I'll use the Arkle and my current bets to try and demonstrate. All hypothetically at this stage.

    My current bets are:

    Appreciate It 4/1 - 20 points win
    Appreciate It 4/1 - 10 points win
    Appreciate It r/u (USA Ryder, Aus Ash) 8.07/1 - 6 points win
    Ferny Hollow 16/1 - 6 points ew
    Ferny Hollow 14/1 - 2 points ew
    Third Time Luckki 50/1 - 1.5 points ew
    Third Time Luckki 16/1 - 5 points ew
    Boothill 50/1 - 1.5 points ew
    Elixir D'ainay 40/1 - 2 points ew
    Saint Roi 33/1 - 2.5 points ew
    Dusart 25/1 - 3 points ew
    Blue Lord 33/1 - 2.25 points ew
    Mister Coffey - 1.5 points ew
    Magic Daze 50/1 - 2.5 points ew

    Let's say my final book looks like this:

    Green - Full stake running
    Amber - Win part laid for profit and place still running
    Purple - Laid
    Blue - Cashed Out
    Red - Lost points from non runner

    Appreciate It 4/1 - 20 points win
    Appreciate It 4/1 - 10 points win
    Appreciate It r/u (USA Ryder, Aus Ash) 8.07/1 - 6 points win
    Ferny Hollow 16/1 - 6 points ew
    Ferny Hollow 14/1 - 2 points ew
    Third Time Luckki 50/1 - 1.5 points ew
    Third Time Luckki 16/1 - 5 points ew
    Boothill 50/1 - 1.5 points ew
    Elixir D'ainay 40/1 - 2 points ew
    Saint Roi 33/1 - 2.5 points ew
    Dusart 25/1 - 3 points ew
    Blue Lord 33/1 - 2.25 points ew
    Mister Coffey - 1.5 points ew
    Magic Daze 50/1 - 2.5 points ew

    So in this example, which is entirely feasible given the Arkle often only has 5-8 runners. I have kept a firm position on Appreciate It after Ferny Hollow has gone elsewhere, although I've laid some of Appreiciate It to ensure I have a balanced book. I've taken a small win position on Third Time Luckki just in case, and I have place positions on Third Time Luckki at 10/1, Boothill at 10/1, Magic Daze at 10/1, and Dusart at 5/1, having already take a very nice profit out of the win bets. Hopefully I've been smart or lucky enough to be holding on to the only real contenders for the three places, and I'm in a very good postion with a guaranteed profit. I've perhaps had a downside on getting caught with 5 or 6 points that are already down, but that's par for the course. If Appreciate It wins, then it's happy days. If he doesn't one of the others do, and couple more place. In which case still win on the bets that come in, and I've made a further profit because of the win and place parts of bets that I've laid.

    I work hard 28 times every year to try and create this kind of position on every race. In some races I'll pull it off, in others I'll take a profit of some kind, and I might have some races where I've had to work on damage limitation. But one thing I'm certain of is that I will make far more using this method, than trying to back 28 individual winners. That said I've put in significantly more than 28 times the effort to do it, and I've been putting that effort in all year to stay on top of every part of it.

    In addition to this approach, which borders on obsession, what you perhaps haven't read from posts I've made previously, is that completely separate from my book I back my individual fancies in the immediate lead up as normal bets. Just the same way any other punter would do. They are my horses for each race, not my book horses, and they're the ones that I cheer up the hill whatever is in my book. It's what normalises the Festival for me, and allows me to enjoy it the way I always have. To do that I use the same processes that everyone does. Form, racereading, trends, statistics, etc, etc. I work hard at those things too. Essentially I enjoy the Festival the same way everyone else does, and I deliberately do so. My book is put to bed and not touched again from the time the tapes go up for the Supreme to when the last horse crosses the line in the last race. I'm just 'Joe Punter' for four days, and the next guy in the crowd that's there for the love of the racing.

    Your post implies that because I make a book I shouldn't talk about other angles, methods, or facts that may potentially make finding winners easy. I may use a method that works for me and diarise it, but freely admit it is far from the only way of making a profit, it's just a very effective method that works for me. One that I work hard on, and certainly not something I feel the need to apologise for. Because I make a book my diary does mask those horses I have a strong opinion on, of which there are plenty. I usually express those opinions on the individual threads, and more recently on the podcasts too though. I'll have a very strong opinion when we talk about the Stayers Hurdle this week for example. These are the horses I back as individual bets and are nothing to do with my book. I don't record them in my diary at all. If you or anyone feel I should record these separate bets I have no problem with that, because I certainly don't want to imply that betting is easy, and you can use a simple method to back 28 winners. Although I suspect you don't believe for one second that's what I was suggesting.

    You also mention the capital it takes to follow the approach I do. All of it has come from methodically going about the business of winning. I've been doing it for 20 odd years. I take it seriously, I devote a considerable amount of time to it, and I've done every hard yard necessary to get to where I am today. All of my betting funds have been built organically and don't get topped up from other sources. I haven't tried to run before I can walk, and I haven't taken any unnecessary risks, and most important of all I've never used money I either don't have or can't afford. Again I have no intention of apologising for that, particularly as since I started posting on Fat Jockey I have been completely open about everything I do, how I do it, how long I've been doing it for, and what it's taken to get where I am today. Unfortunately you've taken one post completely out of context, then referred to my diary which has nothing to do with the post I made, and was in response to a post from another member who I happened to agree with the point he was making. I agreed because it's a fact.

    Hopefully you respect that fact that I have more than gone out of my way to provide a full response to what you said below, and I hope it allays your concerns that I claim finding winners is easy. You probably haven't seen much of what I've previously written given when you joined, so hopefully what I've written above will give you that context. And perhaps it's helped with some understanding with just how many years and how much effort each year it takes to get to the point where I can run a successful book strategy. And that it isn't just about having a bunch of cash to throw away 'backing every fucking horse!!!!' as you seem to think is all I do.

    Anyway, on a lighter note, you'll be pleased to know I'm already looking forward to starting this seasons 'Doing A Naiad' thread, and this time I'll be all out to go one better, which I'm sure will be far more interesting than anything I've written in this post, and will take a fraction of the time to read!


    Firstly I want to thank AaronLad as without his? Post we would not have seen Spectres. If I try and put myself in AL position the key para in Spectres response for me would be the para that begins ‘in addition to this approach’ ..... for me this changes the perspective fundamentally. Originally I was attracted to gambling because of the rather unique blend of art and science. It’s extraordinary pull on both left side and right side of the brain. My personal leaning and preference is slightly in favour of art. The notion of pitting my wits against another, David v Goliath etc etc is a romantic notion that has always appealed. As my personal circumstances have changed so has my attitude to gambling. I have been forced to shift away from art and romance to book building which however we want to describe it to ourselves, to an outsider is simply accountancy. Not simple accountancy as there is enormous complexity around the edges as Spectre has eloquently described but accountancy nevertheless. What I mean about the edges is the extra things that Spectre and others do to build the most profitable book possible. Of course this takes skill and knowledge and hours and hours of dedication. Anybody willing to invest so much of their lives to master this skill should be applauded and supported imo.

    Without the para beginning ‘In addition to’ I would however have a little sympathy with AL’s post. As book building does fly against the original philosophy of gambling. It is designed to remove risk and safeguard which it can be argued is the very antithesis of gambling. This year I built a book and made a profit on nearly every race and enjoyed it less than any other year. I have very few bookmakers available to me and do not have cash out available to me. I also dislike laying as it takes me far too far away from the original philosophy of gambling. There are certain principles I am personally not prepared to abandon and David v Goliath is one such principle. I have no desire to win money off fellow punters, punters who may well be in financial difficulty or may well be addicted. I don’t know they are but I know it is possible and so I will never go down that path.

    As I say it was heart warming to read the para beginning ‘In addition to’ as this is the racing lover, this is the fanatic, this is the gambler and my advice to AL is embrace this para and embrace the fact that Spectre has found an extraordinary way of financing his passion. He is talented, gifted but most of all he loves racing and we need more Spectres.

    On a personal note Spectre...I am more interested in your ‘personal fancies’ than I am in your book building but many others may see it the other way round. Saying there is value in both is an understatement.

    GL Spectre and GL AL.....and Thanks to you both for bringing this incredibly important discussion to the forefront.

    Comment


    • Hear hear

      Comment


      • Originally posted by charlie View Post
        I think a FJ podcast on betting approaches would be interesting. How to build a book, selective betting, leaving it late etc. Approach would need to be well planned and perhaps it would be more something more suitable for after the festival, but I think people would find it beneficial. I've tried building a book in the RSA for the first time this year and reading Spectres above post I have a lot to learn about what building a successful book looks like, and the strategies needed to make it successful.
        I'd second that. It's my first year of having a proper crack at AP betting. I'd love to hear about it from our in house experts. Probably have to wait until after the festival but would be something to look forward to in those dark dark days of April and May.

        Comment


        • Fantastic post Spectre and one that has opened my eyes, as this is my first year of building books on certain races. Ive already learnt from your trend summaries to do my own research and get a small book on the Supreme that I feel has a decent chance of success. I'd be interested in a podcast too, the experience and knowledge on this forum is invaluable
          Last edited by Frankely My Dear; 24 November 2021, 09:29 AM.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Frankely My Dear View Post
            Fantastic post Spectre
            It really is.
            But, the key here, is that Spectre acknowledges this is his strategy and there are countless alternative ways of getting to a Cheltenham profit.
            Ultimately the insight he and others provide is what makes this forum and his input should be applauded…

            Comment


            • Originally posted by twig78 View Post

              I'd second that. It's my first year of having a proper crack at AP betting. I'd love to hear about it from our in house experts. Probably have to wait until after the festival but would be something to look forward to in those dark dark days of April and May.
              Third that, I've been scattergun in my first year of Antepost betting, it's the easy thing to do to just follow the great work others do on this forum - far too many individuals to mention but we all know who they are - but like you've said above, at some point, it'd be great to hear about betting strategies as I'd like to learn myself so I'm not as reliant on others and can contribute more meaningfully on here.

              Comment


              • I enjoyed reading that Spectre, thank you. I love the fact that you have separate, cheer 'em on bets as well as the book to maintain your love of the sport. I have always been a purely recreational punter as I don't have the finances to make a book nor have I developed the requisite skills as I have a cognitive difficulty due to a health condition and have always gone on race watching and what my eye sees and occasionally, (whisper it quietly), some sentiment. I have tried, in the past, to include more stats and analytics but for me, I find then it becomes more like work, and less about the enjoyment and my stakes are never so high that it is a matter of regret if my selection loses, especially if it's to an outstanding & enjoyable performance.

                Comment




                • Doubt many have backed him for the fighting fifth or any antepost cheltenham races, but seems unlikely we'll see him again over here.
                  Belfast Banter.

                  Not sure it's worth putting in the Out of the festival thread,

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Gloria Victis View Post
                    I enjoyed reading that Spectre, thank you. I love the fact that you have separate, cheer 'em on bets as well as the book to maintain your love of the sport. I have always been a purely recreational punter as I don't have the finances to make a book nor have I developed the requisite skills as I have a cognitive difficulty due to a health condition and have always gone on race watching and what my eye sees and occasionally, (whisper it quietly), some sentiment. I have tried, in the past, to include more stats and analytics but for me, I find then it becomes more like work, and less about the enjoyment and my stakes are never so high that it is a matter of regret if my selection loses, especially if it's to an outstanding & enjoyable performance.
                    No need to knock your current system GV - I reckon race watching and then trusting your own judgment is a punter's biggest weapon in the battle with the bookies.

                    And these days we have no excuse because it's possible to watch online replays of every race for free.
                    Last edited by nortonscoin200; 24 November 2021, 04:56 PM.

                    Comment


                    • Tattersalls Cheltenham December sale entries viewable online.

                      If I had my pick and 250k to spare reckon I'd choose this bad boy called Blackcauseway.

                      Wouldn't be surprised if he winds up with Gordon.


                      https://www.tattersallscheltenham.com/sales/cheltenham-december-sale/4DCGI/Sale/CDE21/Main

                      Comment


                      • Doubt I could change now even if I wanted to Nortons

                        Comment


                        • Prob been much discussion on this already….but are we seeing the end of Nicky?

                          He’s been a legend…..and I respect how he puts the horse welfare first

                          But this is a pattern….and not exactly leading to him banging the winners in

                          Been to most top yards….and the energy and ambition at Skelton yard is amazing …..and so easy to see how he gets on with Paul Nicholls….they are so similar with drive and competitive hunger

                          Contrast this much forecast shambles with Paul taking on Irish (and winning) and Henry doing reverse here….if you were an owner where would you put your horse?

                          Sad to see….and think scars of Altior / Cyrname clash poss much to do with it…..but is Shiskin was with Paul or Dan, they would have it ready….almost certainly
                          Fat Jockey Patron (est. Jan 2021)

                          Comment


                          • Top owners will stop sending him horses if this carries on much longer

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Spectre View Post

                              I'm a bit confused about what you're pulling me up on Aaron?

                              Going by recent history, focusing on a handful of trainers will find you most of the winners. Going back a decade or more the winners were shared around a much larger number of trainers. Surely my statement is just factual, so I don't know why you want to pick me up on it. Those trainers will still run maybe a hundred or more horses between them, so you've still got to find the winners amongst them, which makes the task harder. But from something like 20% of all the horses running over the four days, they will potentially win 60-70% of the races. Form and the market is a pretty good guide to narrow the list of potential winners down, and by applying a few additional stats and trends the shortlist usually isn't overly long, so you have a fairly good chance of finding a few winners. Making a profit is an entirely different matter.

                              On the other subject you raise (which is completely unrelated to the subject), the reason I make a book is not just to find the winners from those handful of stables. I attempt to find all the winners and the places available at the best possible odds. I start very early, with some bets being more than a year in advance, and a high percentage of the rest in the month immediately after the Festival. I then use a combination of cash out to get rid of horses I don't want, and BF to lay horses and take the difference in the price I backed at and the best price i can lay at. That process continues all through the year, and come the Festival itself I hope to have the right horses in my book to fill the places, and that will include adjusting my book to account for extra places that bookmakers will offer. You talk about me having 27 horses backed in the first three races, but that's exactly the point at this stage. I want the possibles backed at the best possible prices, and by doing so I have options, none of which are bad. I won't have that number backed still in March, but I will possibly have 60% of that still, many of which I'll have laid the win part for a profit, leaving good odds on some just running for the place. I'll use the Arkle and my current bets to try and demonstrate. All hypothetically at this stage.

                              My current bets are:

                              Appreciate It 4/1 - 20 points win
                              Appreciate It 4/1 - 10 points win
                              Appreciate It r/u (USA Ryder, Aus Ash) 8.07/1 - 6 points win
                              Ferny Hollow 16/1 - 6 points ew
                              Ferny Hollow 14/1 - 2 points ew
                              Third Time Luckki 50/1 - 1.5 points ew
                              Third Time Luckki 16/1 - 5 points ew
                              Boothill 50/1 - 1.5 points ew
                              Elixir D'ainay 40/1 - 2 points ew
                              Saint Roi 33/1 - 2.5 points ew
                              Dusart 25/1 - 3 points ew
                              Blue Lord 33/1 - 2.25 points ew
                              Mister Coffey - 1.5 points ew
                              Magic Daze 50/1 - 2.5 points ew

                              Let's say my final book looks like this:

                              Green - Full stake running
                              Amber - Win part laid for profit and place still running
                              Purple - Laid
                              Blue - Cashed Out
                              Red - Lost points from non runner

                              Appreciate It 4/1 - 20 points win
                              Appreciate It 4/1 - 10 points win
                              Appreciate It r/u (USA Ryder, Aus Ash) 8.07/1 - 6 points win
                              Ferny Hollow 16/1 - 6 points ew
                              Ferny Hollow 14/1 - 2 points ew
                              Third Time Luckki 50/1 - 1.5 points ew
                              Third Time Luckki 16/1 - 5 points ew
                              Boothill 50/1 - 1.5 points ew
                              Elixir D'ainay 40/1 - 2 points ew
                              Saint Roi 33/1 - 2.5 points ew
                              Dusart 25/1 - 3 points ew
                              Blue Lord 33/1 - 2.25 points ew
                              Mister Coffey - 1.5 points ew
                              Magic Daze 50/1 - 2.5 points ew

                              So in this example, which is entirely feasible given the Arkle often only has 5-8 runners. I have kept a firm position on Appreciate It after Ferny Hollow has gone elsewhere, although I've laid some of Appreiciate It to ensure I have a balanced book. I've taken a small win position on Third Time Luckki just in case, and I have place positions on Third Time Luckki at 10/1, Boothill at 10/1, Magic Daze at 10/1, and Dusart at 5/1, having already take a very nice profit out of the win bets. Hopefully I've been smart or lucky enough to be holding on to the only real contenders for the three places, and I'm in a very good postion with a guaranteed profit. I've perhaps had a downside on getting caught with 5 or 6 points that are already down, but that's par for the course. If Appreciate It wins, then it's happy days. If he doesn't one of the others do, and couple more place. In which case still win on the bets that come in, and I've made a further profit because of the win and place parts of bets that I've laid.

                              I work hard 28 times every year to try and create this kind of position on every race. In some races I'll pull it off, in others I'll take a profit of some kind, and I might have some races where I've had to work on damage limitation. But one thing I'm certain of is that I will make far more using this method, than trying to back 28 individual winners. That said I've put in significantly more than 28 times the effort to do it, and I've been putting that effort in all year to stay on top of every part of it.

                              In addition to this approach, which borders on obsession, what you perhaps haven't read from posts I've made previously, is that completely separate from my book I back my individual fancies in the immediate lead up as normal bets. Just the same way any other punter would do. They are my horses for each race, not my book horses, and they're the ones that I cheer up the hill whatever is in my book. It's what normalises the Festival for me, and allows me to enjoy it the way I always have. To do that I use the same processes that everyone does. Form, racereading, trends, statistics, etc, etc. I work hard at those things too. Essentially I enjoy the Festival the same way everyone else does, and I deliberately do so. My book is put to bed and not touched again from the time the tapes go up for the Supreme to when the last horse crosses the line in the last race. I'm just 'Joe Punter' for four days, and the next guy in the crowd that's there for the love of the racing.

                              Your post implies that because I make a book I shouldn't talk about other angles, methods, or facts that may potentially make finding winners easy. I may use a method that works for me and diarise it, but freely admit it is far from the only way of making a profit, it's just a very effective method that works for me. One that I work hard on, and certainly not something I feel the need to apologise for. Because I make a book my diary does mask those horses I have a strong opinion on, of which there are plenty. I usually express those opinions on the individual threads, and more recently on the podcasts too though. I'll have a very strong opinion when we talk about the Stayers Hurdle this week for example. These are the horses I back as individual bets and are nothing to do with my book. I don't record them in my diary at all. If you or anyone feel I should record these separate bets I have no problem with that, because I certainly don't want to imply that betting is easy, and you can use a simple method to back 28 winners. Although I suspect you don't believe for one second that's what I was suggesting.

                              You also mention the capital it takes to follow the approach I do. All of it has come from methodically going about the business of winning. I've been doing it for 20 odd years. I take it seriously, I devote a considerable amount of time to it, and I've done every hard yard necessary to get to where I am today. All of my betting funds have been built organically and don't get topped up from other sources. I haven't tried to run before I can walk, and I haven't taken any unnecessary risks, and most important of all I've never used money I either don't have or can't afford. Again I have no intention of apologising for that, particularly as since I started posting on Fat Jockey I have been completely open about everything I do, how I do it, how long I've been doing it for, and what it's taken to get where I am today. Unfortunately you've taken one post completely out of context, then referred to my diary which has nothing to do with the post I made, and was in response to a post from another member who I happened to agree with the point he was making. I agreed because it's a fact.

                              Hopefully you respect that fact that I have more than gone out of my way to provide a full response to what you said below, and I hope it allays your concerns that I claim finding winners is easy. You probably haven't seen much of what I've previously written given when you joined, so hopefully what I've written above will give you that context. And perhaps it's helped with some understanding with just how many years and how much effort each year it takes to get to the point where I can run a successful book strategy. And that it isn't just about having a bunch of cash to throw away 'backing every fucking horse!!!!' as you seem to think is all I do.

                              Anyway, on a lighter note, you'll be pleased to know I'm already looking forward to starting this seasons 'Doing A Naiad' thread, and this time I'll be all out to go one better, which I'm sure will be far more interesting than anything I've written in this post, and will take a fraction of the time to read!
                              Bloody hell this is good

                              Fair play Spectre for taking the time to respond, and in such detail. I'm sure everyone that reads this will agree to its quality.

                              Although i thought i was fairly aware of the strategy you use, this makes it so much clearer

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Joleg View Post

                                Bloody hell this is good

                                Fair play Spectre for taking the time to respond, and in such detail. I'm sure everyone that reads this will agree to its quality.

                                Although i thought i was fairly aware of the strategy you use, this makes it so much clearer
                                Yes, it was revealing.
                                Thank you Spectre

                                I see Building a Book as a type of Financial Administration, but using Horse Racing instead of the usual Business finances or accountancy.

                                It drives toward financial reward but could feel rather "cold" in a horse racing world full of sporting excitement.

                                I see betting at the Festival as a series of battles, some won, some lost, and with some jeopardy on it.

                                After all who would watch sport if we knew the results already.

                                Also I've never understood how I would enjoy the races at the course each day, if I was trying to track 6, 8, 10 runners in a race.

                                The explanation of ruling off the Betting Book at the start of the Fez and leaving it to tick through unchanged is revealing.

                                Also the idea of picking up the 48-hour decs day-by-day and just betting for fun for the 4 days is exactly what I love to hear.
                                Thank you Spectre for using that way as your true form of racecourse enjoyment.
                                Absolutely brilliant.


                                Personally on some races I'm in too deep in numbers on some races, than I am normally happy with, and I am ready now for some clashes this weekend and through to Christmas week to sort out the potential for as many horses as possible and hopefully allow me to reduce the numbers backed via cashout.

                                A normal target by the Festival would be 3 max, sometimes two or only one.

                                Let the mid-season battles commence.
                                Last edited by Saxon Warrior; 24 November 2021, 08:34 PM.
                                "Journeys to Glory, breathing in his head".

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X